Home
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Attorneys
    • Neil B. Mooney
    • Bryan W. Blades
  • Practice Areas
    • Customs
    • Export Controls
    • International Trade
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Money Seizures
    • Federal Maritime Commission
    • Admiralty and Air Cargo
    • Compliance
    • Food and Drug Administration
    • Transactional
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Employment Agreements
    • Global Presence
  • Seminars
    • Internal Corporate Compliance Presentations
    • FMC OTI Training
  • Offices
    • Florida
    • Washington, D.C.
  • Contact Us

Admiralty and Air Cargo

Admiralty is a unique area of the law with distinct and specific rules for handling claims. Normal rules of judicial procedure do not apply when an admiralty suit is filed or defended. Not all customs lawyers are familiar with admiralty rules and claims. Admiralty claims include:
  • Claims governed by the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA)
  • Arrest of a ship to satisfy debts attaching to it in rem
  • Special statutory obligations arising from the injuries of a sailor or dockworker
  • Cargo claims and the defense thereof arising in sea freight
  • Claims based upon contracts of affreightment (ocean bills of lading or charter agreements) and venue or liability issues arising therefrom
  • Collision
  • Salvage and wreck removal
  • Marine insurance coverage
Familiarity with the rules of admiralty is key to effective representation in this field. We have successfully prosecuted and defended admiralty actions. We have also provided counsel to clients regarding Customs penalty and seizure actions against both air and ocean carriers.

The Warsaw Convention and its amendments govern carrier liability issues as to air cargo and passengers worldwide. However, there is a small time limitation period that governs air cargo and passenger claims, and to enforce one’s rights one must act quickly.

Likewise, when representing carriers, we apply the rules of the Warsaw Convention to defend adverse claims. We investigate matters thoroughly to determine whether another party is or may be liable for any loss incurred.
From the Trade Blog RSS Feed

August A Busy Month For Export Control Regulation Amendments: Changes to the ITAR Dual-National Rule and Commodity Jurisdiction Process (Aug. 15, 2010)
The Court of International Trade Confirms that CBP Has Unlimited Time to Decide Protests (Jul. 22, 2010)
Freight Forwarder Settles Charge of Antiboycott Violation for Furnishing Negative Certification of Origin on Shipper’s Invoice (Jun. 30, 2010)
When Is A Part A “Part of General Use?” The Federal Circuit Answers (Jun. 8, 2010)
Hong Kong alternative to China unions? (Jun. 4, 2010)
More

Trade Law Bulletin

Enter your email address to receive our trade bulletins.

Trade Events

Complying With U.S. Export Controls (January 26 & 27, 2010, Phoenix, AZ)
CBP Trade Symposium 2009 (Dec. 8-10, 2009, Washington, D.C.)
The Doha Round: Can We Get to Yes? (Nov. 19, 2009, Washington, D.C.)
How to Develop an Export Management and Compliance Program (Nov. 18 & 19, 2009, Seattle, WA)
Export Controls - Compliance and Best Business Practices (Nov. 18, 2009, Miami, FL)
More
Trade Resources

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
Export Administration Regulations
International Traffic in Arms Regulations
Federal Maritime Commission Regulations
Food and Drug Administration Regulations
More

Attorney Advertising
Copyright © 1999-2009 The Mooney Law Firm All Rights Reserved